Lea Nilsson vs Eva Bennemann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When examining recent second serve performance, Eva Bennemann has a slight edge, winning 38.06% of points compared to Lea Nilsson's 37.14%. Does this small margin indicate a potential advantage for Bennemann in the upcoming match?
• Return game statistics favor Lea Nilsson on second serve points, with her winning 56.00% against Eva Bennemann's 49.28%. This suggests Nilsson may have the upper hand in return games.
• In handling first serve returns, Eva Bennemann performs better with a 37.63% success rate compared to Lea Nilsson's 34.25%. Could this be a critical factor in determining the match's outcome?
• Under pressure, Bennemann excels in saving breakpoints, achieving a 46.88% success rate versus Nilsson's 31.86%. This skill could be pivotal in tense match situations.
• Over the past year, Eva Bennemann has a stronger win percentage at 71.88% compared to Nilsson's 63.16%, indicating a more consistent performance level.
• Both players have their highest career win percentage on indoor hard surfaces at 70%, leveling the playing field when it comes to their preferred surface.
• Lea Nilsson contends against higher-ranked opponents on average, with a notable opponent rank difference compared to Bennemann, facing those ranked at an average of 208.74 versus Bennemann's 350.44. Does this suggest Nilsson is more battle-tested?
• In deciding sets, Lea Nilsson outperforms, winning 57% compared to Eva Bennemann’s 43%, perhaps indicating resilience in crucial stages.
• Bennemann slightly outperforms Nilsson in break point conversion, with a success rate of 48.82% over Nilsson’s 45.26%. This capability could prove decisive in tightly contested games.

Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):

In assessing the upcoming match, the data reveals a competitive balance between the two players. Both Lea Nilsson and Eva Bennemann have demonstrated strong performances in various statistical areas. Bennemann's slight edge in second serve points and breakpoint conversion indicates her potential to capitalize on opportunities.

However, Nilsson’s superior performance in returning second serves and prevailing in deciding sets may provide her with crucial advantages. The higher quality of her opponents and her ability to handle pressure better against stronger competition could prepare her well for this matchup.

While Bennemann shows strengths in saving breakpoints and delivering consistent match results over the past year, Nilsson's resilience and stronger return game might give her the defining edge. Based on these insights, Lea Nilsson is slightly favored to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.